Brief review of trends in political change: freedom and conflict

Click here to go back to the reports page.
First Copyright March 2003.  May be used provided proper citation is given.  See note at bottom.

NOTE: When this report was prepared, the data links were valid. Since then some have changed and some data are no longer available.

____________

I. Overview
____________

This report describes world political characteristics, in particular, freedom and conflict, and changes in those characteristics. In brief, an analysis shows:

 

____________________

II. Detailed Analysis
____________________
Return to top

A. Freedom

The Freedom House country ratings can be combined with census from the International Database data to show the number of people who were living in countries with freedom, partial freedom and no freedom. These data show that almost all people in developed countries are free, freedom increased for both less developed and more developed countries. However, using population to examine freedom in less developed countries shows that there was only moderate growth in the number of people in freedom in Less Developed countries.


Table 1
Percent of people living in countries that are free, partially free, not free

1980
2000
Less Developed Countries
     Free
26.5%
31.5%
     Partially Free
29%
26%
     Not Free
45%
43%
More Developed Countries
     Free
88%
99%
     Partially Free
5%
0.2%
     Not Free
7%

Freedom House ratings available at  http://www.freedomhouse.org/  
Combined with US Census Bureau's population data from the International Data Base


The above analysis does not include many of the countries and satelites of the former Soviet Union. These countries did not exist until 1990 or so. In 2000, a few of these countries (e.g., Latvia, Slovakia, Slovenia, also East Germany) were free. Several more were partially free, but a few (e.g., Belarus, Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan) were still not free in 2000. Inclusion of these countries might change the percents above slightly.

A graphical examination of trends in poverty show that the number of people who are free has generally increased, however, the number of people who are not free has also increased.
Figure 1
trends in freedom


A number of less developed countries gained freedom, while a number of less developed countries lost partial freedom. (No countries went from Free to Not Free.)
 
LDCs that changed from not free to free, 
1980 to 2000

Benin
Bolivia
Cape Verde
Chile
Mali
Mongolia
Sao Tome and Principe
Suriname
 

LDCs that changed from partially free to not free,
1980 to 2000

Bhutan
Egypt
Iran
Kenya
Maldives
Sudan
Swaziland
Tunisia
United Arab Emirates
Zimbabwe
 


Return to top

B. Armed Conflict.
The global total figure, below, shows increase in conflict from the 1950s to the high point in the early 1990s, then a reduction in conflict. By 2001, conflict had returned to the 1980s level, still much higher than conflict in the 1950s, 60s and 70s.

Almost all of the growth and decline in armed conflict is accounted for by internal conflict, or civil wars. For all of this time period, the number of internal conflicts was about 50 or fewer in any single year. That is, among the 190 countries of the world, and at most 26% of countries were experiencing civil war, and thus almost 75% of countries were not.

Figure 2
Number of Armed Conflicts
1946-2001

number of armed conflicts, 1946-2001
Prepared by Dr. Shackman from 1946-2001 Armed conflict data  At the PRIO site (see below)

Return to top

C. Refugees

The pattern of refugees seems to follow the pattern of civil warfare, shown in figure one above. That is, there was an increase during the 1980s and then a decrease in the 1990s.

During this time period, the number of refugees was generally less than 20 million in any year. This is less than 0.3% of the total world population, and less than 0.4% of LDC population. However, of course, any number of refugees is too many.

Figure 3
Estimated Number of Refugees, Worldwide, 1980-2003

total number of refugees, 1980-2003

Prepared by Dr. Shackman from data at UNHCR statistics site
http://www.unhcr.org/cgi-bin/texis/vtx/statistics
(off line on 28 March 2009, will check again)
click on Refugees by Numbers 2004 Edition, from 22 September 2004.


Data on refugees by region show that over the last several years, most refugees are from Asia, then from Africa. A smaller number are from Europe. Additional data (not presented) shows that there has been a continuous decline in the number of refugees from Latin America and the Caribbean, from 172 thousand in 1992 to 85 thousand in 2001.

Figure 4
Estimated Number of Refugees
1992 to 2002

refugees byregion, 1992 to 2002
Calculated by Dr. Shackman from data at
UNHCR statistics site
http://www.unhcr.org/cgi-bin/texis/vtx/statistics
(off line on 28 March 2009, will check again)
UNHCR STATISTICAL YEARBOOK 2001, 2002, Annex A.5
Refugee population by region of origin, 1992-2001 (thousands).

Return to top

D. Terrorism

Data from the US Department of State shows that, since the late 1980s, there has been a decline in the number of international terrorist attacks. Data from the Terrorism Knowledge base show a similar decline since the early 1980s.

The major decline in international terrorist attacks was in Western Europe. On the other hand, Asia experienced an increase in international terrorist attacks. Other regions experienced less consistent patterns over time

From 1991 to 2003, there was a consistent increase in the number of casualties from international terrorist attacks in Asia, but few other consistent trends in casualties from international terrorist attacks. Three different regions had, in three different years,  a few attacks with a large number of casualties.

On the other hand, data from the MIPT Terrorism Knowledge Base show that since the mid to late 1990's there has been a large increase in the number of total terrorist incidences, injuries and fatalities.  Most of this increase is due to an increase in domestic terrorism (data not shown, private communication with MIPT staff).

Figure 5
Total International Terrorist Attacks
1977-2003 by year

Total International Terrorist Attacks
Prepared by Dr. Shackman from data at  Patterns of Global Terrorism http://www.state.gov/j/ct/rls/crt/index.htm   


Figure 6

International Terrorist Incidents, by region
1991-2003
terrorist incidents by region
Prepared by Dr. Shackman from reports at Patterns of Global Terrorism http://www.state.gov/j/ct/rls/crt/index.htm  


Figure 7
International Terrorist Incidences
1968 to 2004
terrorist incidents by region, from mipt
Graph from MIPT database, had been here http://www.tkb.org/Home.jsp
Used by permission
Data are now here  http://www.start.umd.edu/gtd/   


Figure 8

Casualties from International Terrorist Incidents, by region
1991-2003
terror casualties,
          from us dept of state
Prepared by Dr. Shackman from reports at   Patterns of Global Terrorism, 2003, and earlier reports
   http://www.state.gov/j/ct/rls/crt/2003/      
 


Figure 9
Deaths from International Terrorist Attacks
1968 to 2004
Excluding North America
deaths from
            terrorist attacks, by region
Graph from MIPT database, had been here http://www.tkb.org/Home.jsp
Used by permission
Data are now here  http://www.start.umd.edu/gtd/   


Return to top

_____________

III. Appendix
_____________


A. Comparisons with reports from other sources

1.
  The report, Peace and Conflict 2003: A Global Survey of Armed Conflicts, Self-Determination Movements, and Democracy, also shows trends in governance types. However, the report shows that the pattern of growth in democracy has not been a constant pattern.  In 1950 there were about the same number of democracies and autocracies. The number of democracies continuously increased up to the late 1980s, and then "A dramatic global shift away from rigidly autocratic regimes and toward democracy began in the mid-1980s, before the end of the Cold War, and continued into the mid-1990s."

2.
  The Peace and Conflict 2003 report also shows patterns of magnitude of war, with results similar to the results shown above. This report also shows that the majority of growth and decline in warfare has been civil war.

Monty G. Marshall and Ted Robert Gurr. Peace and Conflict 2003: A Global Survey of Armed Conflicts, Self-Determination Movements, and Democracy  Integrated Network for Societal Conflict Research (INSCR), Center for International Development and Conflict Management (CIDCM), University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA (Publication Date: February 2003). Available at  http://www.cidcm.umd.edu/publications/pub.aspx?pubType=paper&id=2   more recent reports are here   http://www.cidcm.umd.edu/about/people/profile.aspx?id=10     

3. Democratic Peace Clock   http://www.hawaii.edu/powerkills/DP.CLOCK.HTM   has some figures showing trends in democracy and democide (genocide and mass murder). which generally agree with the figures presented in our report. Also see tables and figures at the Statistics of Democide page   http://www.hawaii.edu/powerkills/NOTE5.HTM   for example, Figure 23.1. Yearly Total Democide for All Regimes Versus State Regimes.


 
B.  Data NOTE: Conclusions in the report presented here do not necessarily represent the opinions of the organizations from which we use the data.

Return to top

Freedom

Freedom House state freedom is here
http://www.freedomhouse.org/ratings/index.htm
Since 1972, Freedom House has published an annual assessment of state state of freedom by assigning each country and territory the status of "Free," "Partly Free,"
or  "Not Free" by averaging their political rights and civil liberties ratings.

The definitions were listed at
http://www.freedomhouse.org/research/freeworld/2000/methodology.htm
According to this page: "The Survey attempts to judge all countries and territories by a single standard and to emphasize the importance of democracy and freedom. At a minimum, a democracy is a political system in which the people choose their authoritative leaders freely from among competing groups and individuals who were not designated by the government. Freedom represents the opportunity to act spontaneously in a variety of fields outside the control of the government and other centers of potential domination."

"Freedom House rates ...  the rights and freedoms enjoyed by individuals in each country or territory."

"The Survey’s understanding of freedom encompasses two general sets of characteristics grouped under political rights and civil liberties. Political rights enable people to participate freely in the political process, which is the system by which the polity chooses authoritative policy makers and attempts to make binding decisions affecting the national, regional, or local community. In a free society, this represents the right of all adults to vote and compete for public office, and for elected representatives to have a decisive vote on public policies. Civil liberties include the freedoms to develop views, institutions, and personal autonomy apart from the state."

In the figure presented above, each former Soviet Union state is counted seperately. Before the break up of the Soviet Union in 1991, each state had the Soviet Union rating of "Not Free" assigned to it. After 1991, each state was rated seperately.
 

Armed Conflict, International Peace Research Institute, Oslo (PRIO),  http://www.pcr.uu.se/   specifically from the Armed Conflict 1946 - 2001, Gleditsch, Wallensteen, Eriksson, Sollenberg & Strand, International Peace Research Institute, Oslo (PRIO), Department of Peace and Conflict Research, Uppsala University at this PRIO website   http://www.prio.no/CSCW/Datasets/Armed-Conflict/UCDP-PRIO/   The codebook is: Armed Conflict Dataset Codebook, Håvard Strand, Lars Wilhelmsen & Nils Petter Gleditsch, International Peace Research Institute, Oslo (PRIO). in collaboration with: Peter Wallensteen, Margareta Sollenberg & Mikael Eriksson, Department of Peace and Conflict Research, Uppsala University
and Halvard Buhaug & Jan Ketil Rød, Department of Sociology and Political Science/Department of Geomatics, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU). Version 1.2, 31 January 2003

According to the codebook: "An armed conflict is a contested incompatibility that concerns government and/or territory where the use of armed force between two parties, of which at least one is the government of a state, results in at least 25 battle-related deaths." (page 2.)

Further, according to the codebook (page 8 and 9):

There are four types of conflict:
1. Extra-state: Extra-state conflict is a conflict over a territory between a government and one or more opposition groups, where the territory is a colony of the government.
2. Interstate: Interstate conflict is a conflict between two or more countries and governments.
3. Internal: Internal conflict is conflict within a country between a government and one or more opposition groups, with no interference from other countries
4. Internationalized internal: Similar to Internal conflict, but where the government, the opposition or both sides receive support from other governments
(We [Shackman, Liu and Wang] called the first type of conflict "colonial", just for easier graphing.).
 
Return to top 

Refugees

UNHCR - UN Refugee Agency
, data from annual statistics reports,

UNHCR STATISTICAL YEARBOOK 2001, 2002           
Annex A.5, Refugee population by region of origin, 1992-2001 (thousands)      

and Statistics at a Glance

both available at
http://www.unhcr.org/cgi-bin/texis/vtx/statistics 

Also, 2001 and 2000 data are available here 
http://www.unhcr.org/cgi-bin/texis/vtx/statistics
(off line on 28 March 2009, will check again)

 

Terrorism

Patterns of Global Terrorism - US Department of State   Patterns of Global Terrorism  http://www.state.gov/j/ct/rls/crt/index.htm  
statistical data from various years, of international terrorism, that is, terrorism involving people from more than one country.

See the introduction at   for definitions of terrorism:

No one definition of terrorism has gained universal acceptance. For the purposes of this report, however, we have chosen the definition of terrorism contained in Title 22 of the United States Code, Section 2656f(d). That statute contains the following definitions:
Data figures include

The 2003 report
Total International Terrorist Attacks, 1981-2003
Total International Casualties by Region, 1998-2003
Total International Attacks by Region, 1998-2003

The 2001report
including
Total International Terrorist Attacks, 1981-2001
Total International Casualties by Region, 1996-2001

The 2000 report
Total International Casualties by Region, 1995-2000
Total International Terrorist Attacks, 1981-2000

The 1996 report at  http://www.state.gov/www/global/terrorism/annual_reports.html
has International Terrorist Incidents Over Time, 1977-96
Casualties of International Terrorist Incidents, 1991-96

 
MIPT Terrorism Knowledge Base
The National Memorial Institute for the Prevention of Terrorism
Had been here  http://www.tkb.org/Home.jsp
accessed 9/10/04
Data are now here 
http://www.start.umd.edu/gtd/   


Data are from the Incidence Reports had been here  http://www.tkb.org/AnalyticalTools.jsp
The incidences, injuries and fatalities in the tables and figures in this report are both domestic and international. The MIPT site glossary page  which had been here   http://www.tkb.org/Glossary.jsp had defined terrorism

Domestic Terrorism:
Incidents perpetrated by local nationals against a purely domestic target.
International Terrorism: Incidents in which terrorists go abroad to strike their targets, select domestic targets associated with a foreign state, or create an international incident by attacking airline passengers, personnel or equipment.


Prepared by gene shackman, wang xun and ya-lin liu
First Copyright March 2003, Renewed October 2004 and in April 2008.  May be freely used provided proper citation is given.

Cite as


Shackman, Gene, Ya-Lin Liu and Xun Wang. 2004. Brief review of world political trends.  Available at

http://gsociology.icaap.org/report/polsum.html

Return to top

Click here to go back to reports page.
last updated  3/31/12
last verified 3/31/12

click here to see who we are or to contact us